Is drug testing an unwarranted invasion of employee privacy Essay

1. Is drug testing an unwarranted invasion of employee privacy? Applying for a job means that you atomic number 18 in conform to the rules and regulation of the friendship where you are applying. Once you live been accepted, part of that is the medical examination including the drug testing. If you are physically and medically fit, then you are hired. So, the dubiety regarding unwarranted invasion of employee privacy is not relevant in this situation. You need the job so you apply to submit yourself to the requirements of the federation regarding drug testing.So, it means to say, that the employer has the rights to know the result of the drug testing for them to be fitting to qualify their employees for any promotion or acceptance to the company. 2. Which is more importantgetting drugs out of the employment or protecting the privacy of the employee? Once the employee is positive on drugs, the best thing is to eliminate or terminate the employee sooner than having the employe e on the workplace. As the saying goes, once there is a rotten thing in a certain place, in the long run it will make all the things in that place rotten.So, the best thing and the most important are to get the drugs out of the workplace rather than protecting the privacy of the employee. But judging the employee as drug dependent it has to be supported by documents stating that the employee is positive on drugs. 3. What about other health-threatening activities, i. e. smoking outside of working hours, unprotected sex, etc. With the examples buckle undern, it is already outside the working hours of the employee and the company has no more control over those activities.An individual right of the someone has to be considered in this matter. It is his/her prerogative to do those activities that will satisfy his/her needs as long as it will not affect his/her performance on his/her job. But once, the work is affected because of those health-threatening activities then I should say th at the individuals attention must be called or the company may give sanction regarding those offenses the employee may commit. The employee has the right to choose between the right and the wrong depends on what is best for him/her. 4.Should employers be allowed to use polygraph tests to screen out potentially costly employees who may engage in any of these activities? For the companys benefit, the use of polygraph test to screen out potentially costly employee who may engage in those activities can be allowed. Using the polygraph tests will be of great expense on the part of the employer and the employee. though it may give a great benefit on the part of the employer by screening the employees that they are going to hire and they are sure that the person who passed the polygraph test are people who can be trusted and will be an asset to the company.But the thing is, are the employees willing to submit themselves on the polygraph testing? An individual right again says that an indiv idual has the right to refuse any test that has to be done to them. So, when they refuse, the employer cant do anything about it but to agree with the employee. But if it is a companys policy then the employee has to make a choice whether to bear or not to continue in applying in the said company.